Why is XRF analysis preferred over traditional sampling methods?

XRF (X-ray fluorescence) analysis is preferred over traditional sampling methods primarily because it provides immediate results without needing lab analysis. This rapid feedback is crucial in situations where timely decision-making is required, such as assessing lead levels in housing or public facilities. The instant results allow risk assessors to quickly determine the presence of lead and take appropriate action, whether that means initiating remediation or further investigation.

In contrast, traditional sampling methods typically involve collecting samples and sending them to a laboratory for analysis, which can take days or even weeks to return results. This delay can hinder prompt responses to potential lead hazards. Additionally, while factors such as cost and sample size may be important in choosing assessment methods, the immediacy of the data provided by XRF analysis is a significant advantage that enhances the effectiveness of lead risk assessment practices.